|
78%
POCO X4 Pro
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
78%
vivo T1
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
POCO X4 Pro vs vivo T1
Comparing the POCO X4 Pro vs vivo T1 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: POCO X4 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,988, while vivo T1 scores 1,947, making POCO X4 Pro the better performer.
Display: POCO X4 Pro offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while vivo T1 offers 6.58 inches, making POCO X4 Pro the larger display of the two. POCO X4 Pro features a AMOLED display compared to vivo T1's IPS LCD, making POCO X4 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: POCO X4 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while vivo T1 offers 50 MP, making POCO X4 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both POCO X4 Pro and vivo T1 feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo T1 delivers longer battery life with 19h 51m, while POCO X4 Pro delivers 16h 56m, making vivo T1 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: POCO X4 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo T1 offers 128 GB, making POCO X4 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: POCO X4 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 7.4 from the editorial team, while vivo T1 is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo T1 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while POCO X4 Pro has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
POCO X4 Pro
₹18,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo T1
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
05 Apr, 2022
|
14 Feb, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 695
|
Snapdragon 695
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.58 inches (16.71 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
67W Sonic Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.4/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(94,011 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(69,872 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
393,322
AnTuTu Score
|
409,989
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
19h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Feb 14, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 619
|
Adreno 619
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
393,322
|
409,989
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
16.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
29.9 %
|
22.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
6.58 inches (16.71 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1200 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
395 ppi
|
401 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.01 %
|
84.09 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.60 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.1 mm
|
164 mm
|
Width
|
76.1 mm
|
75.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
205 grams
|
187 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleS5KGW3 ISOCELL Plus 0.7µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleS5KJN1 ISO-CELL |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Short Video Mode |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 67W Sonic Charging 100% in 41 minutes
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 56m
|
19h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 42m 47s
|
1h 51m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N78 |
5G Bands: TDD N77 / N78
|
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: TDD N77 / N78
|
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.861 W/kg Body: 0.583 W/kg
|
Head: 1.16 W/kg Body: 0.98 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|