|
76%
realme 9 5G
₹13,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Infinix Note 12 Turbo
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme 9 5G vs Infinix Note 12 Turbo
Comparing the realme 9 5G vs Infinix Note 12 Turbo across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme 9 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,794, while Infinix Note 12 Turbo scores 1,739, making realme 9 5G the better performer.
Display: Infinix Note 12 Turbo offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while realme 9 5G offers 6.5 inches, making Infinix Note 12 Turbo the larger display of the two. Infinix Note 12 Turbo features a AMOLED display compared to realme 9 5G's IPS LCD, making Infinix Note 12 Turbo the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Infinix Note 12 Turbo offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while realme 9 5G offers 48 MP, making Infinix Note 12 Turbo better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both realme 9 5G and Infinix Note 12 Turbo feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: realme 9 5G delivers longer battery life with 13h 25m, while Infinix Note 12 Turbo delivers 12h 53m, making realme 9 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: realme 9 5G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Infinix Note 12 Turbo offers 128 GB, making realme 9 5G the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both realme 9 5G and Infinix Note 12 Turbo equally at 7.
User Rating: realme 9 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Infinix Note 12 Turbo has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
realme 9 5G
₹13,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Infinix Note 12 Turbo
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
10 Mar, 2022
|
27 May, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 810
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMCP
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(43,547 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(9,414 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
13h 25m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 53m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
349,257
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 10, 2022
(Official)
|
May 27, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
XOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 810
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
349,257
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
20.0 s
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
34.2 %
|
30.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
600 nits
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.92 %
|
85.79 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Yes
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.5 %
|
92 %
|
Design
Height
|
162.5 mm
|
164.5 mm
|
Width
|
74.8 mm
|
76.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
184.5 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view25.4 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size S5KGM1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera21.9 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera21.9 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6120 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
QWXGA 2K @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.1 Wide Angle Primary Camera25.6 mm focal length 1/3.09" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 55 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 25m
|
12h 53m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 59m 20s
|
1h 34m 33s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMCP
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N28
TDD N41 / N77 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.053 W/kg Body: 0.738 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
DTS Sound
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|