Samsung C100
|
LG KS500
|
vivo X300 Ultra
₹159,999
|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung C100 vs LG KS500
Share
Comparing the Samsung C100 vs LG KS500 across storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Storage: Samsung C100 offers higher internal storage with 300 GB, while LG KS500 offers 100 GB, making Samsung C100 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Samsung C100
|
✕
LG KS500
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
01 Apr, 2003
|
01 Mar, 2009
|
14 May, 2026
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Octa Core (upto 4.61 GHz)
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
16 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
|
N/A
|
LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
128.00x 128 pixels , 5 lines px
|
320.00x 320 pixels, 2.0 inches px
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
200 MP
Primary Camera (upto 3.7x Optical Zoom)
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
200 MP
Telephoto Camera
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
50 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6600 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
100W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
300 KB
|
100 MB
|
512 GB
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
8.7/10
|
Pros
|
|
|
Cons
|
|
|
User Ratings
|
5/5
(1 rating)
|
N/A
|
4.6/5
(29 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3,977,648
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
15h 10m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹159,999
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
May 06, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7 Year
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Origin OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Best In Class
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SM8850-AC
|
Processor
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Octa core
4.61 GHz, Dual core, Oryon 3.62 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Adreno 840
|
RAM
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
16 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3,977,648
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
14.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6,450
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
21.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
N/A
|
LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
Resolution
|
128.00x 128 pixels 5 lines px
|
320.00x 320 pixels 2.0 inches px
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
4500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
19.8:9
|
Pixel Density
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
510 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
89.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
94.49 %
|
Design
Height
|
111.00 mm
|
102.80 mm
|
162.98 mm
|
Width
|
45.00 mm
|
49.20 mm
|
76.81 mm
|
Thickness
|
17.00 mm
|
14.90 mm
|
8.19 mm
|
Weight
|
76 grams
|
106 grams
|
232 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Back: Glass
|
Rear Camera
Front Camera
Battery
Battery Test Results
Storage
Network & Connectivity
Multimedia
Sensors
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹159,999
|