|
73%
Samsung Galaxy A50s
₹24,900
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Xiaomi Mi A3
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A50s vs Xiaomi Mi A3
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A50s vs Xiaomi Mi A3 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Mi A3 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,385, while Samsung Galaxy A50s scores 1,274, making Xiaomi Mi A3 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A50s offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while Xiaomi Mi A3 offers 6.08 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A50s the larger display of the two. Both Samsung Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Mi A3 feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Mi A3 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Mi A3 feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Mi A3 offers a higher battery capacity with 4030 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy A50s offers 4000 mAh, making Xiaomi Mi A3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Xiaomi Mi A3 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy A50s offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Mi A3 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy A50s and Xiaomi Mi A3 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A50s receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Xiaomi Mi A3 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A50s
₹24,900
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Mi A3
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
11 Sep, 2019
|
23 Aug, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.08 inches (15.44 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4030 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(55,504 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(62,827 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
153,226
AnTuTu Score
|
140,257
AnTuTu Score
|
|
11h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 11, 2019
(Official)
|
Aug 23, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Android One
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
153,226
|
140,257
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
8.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
31.5 %
|
8.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.08 inches (15.44 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
283 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.97 %
|
82.15 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
158.5 mm
|
153.4 mm
|
Width
|
74.5 mm
|
71.85 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
166 grams
|
173.8 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01/2" sensor size IMX582 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.791/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size Exmor RS |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 1.6µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4030 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 32 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging v3.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 29m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 45m 24s
|
2h 30m 28s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.769 W/kg
|
Head: 0.527 W/kg Body: 0.722 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|