|
77%
Samsung Galaxy A51
₹25,999
(Out of Stock)
|
81%
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs vivo X50
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A51 vs vivo X50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo X50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,780, while Samsung Galaxy A51 scores 1,196, making vivo X50 the better performer.
Display: vivo X50 offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Samsung Galaxy A51 offers 6.5 inches, making vivo X50 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy A51 features a Super AMOLED display compared to vivo X50's AMOLED, making Samsung Galaxy A51 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A51 and vivo X50 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A51 and vivo X50 feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo X50 offers a higher battery capacity with 4200 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy A51 offers 4000 mAh, making vivo X50 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy A51 and vivo X50 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy A51 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while vivo X50 is rated 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A51 and vivo X50 both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A51
₹25,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
29 Jan, 2020
|
24 Jul, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Snapdragon 730
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
12 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
13 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4200 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
33W Flash Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.0
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(13,353 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(2,567 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
171,285
AnTuTu Score
|
281,854
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 29, 2020
(Official)
|
Jul 24, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
8 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
171,285
|
281,854
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
8.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
32.7 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.8:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
398 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
87.44 %
|
86.51 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
92.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
158.5 mm
|
159.5 mm
|
Width
|
73.6 mm
|
75.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
7.5 mm
|
Weight
|
172 grams
|
173 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.026 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size S5KGM2 ISO-CELL 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera20x Digital Zoomf/1.6 Wide AngleIMX598 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor |
|
12 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
13 MP
f/2.46 Depth Camera50 mm focal length |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
5 MP
f/2.48 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
20 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.45 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Soft light flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 32 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging v2.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 29m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 35m 31s
|
1h 17m 32s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.0
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.598 W/kg
|
Head: 1.24 W/kg Body: 0.39 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|