|
79%
Samsung Galaxy A70s
₹31,000
|
75%
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A70s vs Samsung Galaxy A50
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A70s vs Samsung Galaxy A50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy A50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,372, while Samsung Galaxy A70s scores 1,586, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A70s offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while Samsung Galaxy A50 offers 6.4 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A70s the larger display of the two. Both Samsung Galaxy A70s and Samsung Galaxy A50 feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy A70s offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Samsung Galaxy A50 offers 25 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A70s better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy A70s offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy A50 offers 25 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A70s better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy A70s offers a higher battery capacity with 4500 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy A50 offers 4000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy A70s better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy A70s offers 128 GB, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A50 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy A70s has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A70s
₹31,000
@ Flipkart
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
04 Oct, 2019
|
02 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
25 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
25 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.0
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(6,144 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(100,914 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
204,400
AnTuTu Score
|
143,399
AnTuTu Score
|
|
10h 58m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹31,000
|
Not Available in any store
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 04, 2019
(Official)
|
Mar 02, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
204,400
|
143,399
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
28.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
30.5 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
393 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86 %
|
84.97 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.3 mm
|
158.5 mm
|
Width
|
76.7 mm
|
74.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
7.7 mm
|
Weight
|
187 grams
|
166 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.81/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
25 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.726 mm focal length CMOS image sensor |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera13 mm focal length |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
5288 x 3968 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size |
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera25 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS |
Autofocus
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
No
|
No
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 28 Hours(3G)
|
Up to 23 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
10h 58m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 32m 38s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.0
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.202 W/kg
|
Head: 0.335 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹31,000
|
Not Available in any store
|