|
80%
Samsung Galaxy A71
₹29,500
(Out of Stock)
|
79%
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy A71 vs vivo V17
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A71 vs vivo V17 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy A71 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,746, while vivo V17 scores 1,651, making Samsung Galaxy A71 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while vivo V17 offers 6.44 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A71 the larger display of the two. vivo V17 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Samsung Galaxy A71's Super AMOLED Plus, making vivo V17 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy A71 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while vivo V17 offers 48 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A71 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo V17 feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Both Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo V17 offer the same 4500 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo V17 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo V17 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A71 and vivo V17 both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A71
₹29,500
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
80%
|
79%
|
Release Date
|
24 Feb, 2020
|
10 Dec, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 730
|
Snapdragon 675
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
12 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
25W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(8,844 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(13,957 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
266,827
AnTuTu Score
|
227,722
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 09m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 24, 2020
(Official)
|
Dec 10, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Adreno 612
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
266,827
|
227,722
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
26.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
11.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
10.7 %
|
33.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED Plus
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
393 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
87.17 %
|
84.99 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
163.6 mm
|
159 mm
|
Width
|
76 mm
|
74.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
8.5 mm
|
Weight
|
179 grams
|
176 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.826 mm focal length 1/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size IMX582 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
12 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera23 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 42 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 09m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 46m 1s
|
1h 46m 18s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 13) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.836 W/kg
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.251 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|