|
74%
Samsung Galaxy F12
₹11,499
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy F12 vs Moto G22
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F12 vs Moto G22 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G22 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 946, while Samsung Galaxy F12 scores 815, making Moto G22 the better performer.
Display: Both Samsung Galaxy F12 and Moto G22 offer the same screen size of 6.5 inches, but Moto G22 features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F12's PLS TFT LCD, making Moto G22 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Moto G22 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F12 offers 48 MP, making Moto G22 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G22 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F12 offers 8 MP, making Moto G22 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy F12 delivers longer battery life with 19h 04m, while Moto G22 delivers 15h 58m, making Samsung Galaxy F12 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy F12 and Moto G22 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F12 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G22 has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F12
₹11,499
@ Samsung Shop
|
✕
Moto G22
₹13,999
@ Flipkart
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
12 Apr, 2021
|
15 Jun, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 850
|
MediaTek Helio G37
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(302,590 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(35,814 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
101,743
AnTuTu Score
|
114,996
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 04m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
15h 58m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹11,499
|
₹13,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 12, 2021
(Official)
|
Jun 15, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 850
|
MediaTek Helio G37
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MP1
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
101,743
|
114,996
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
34.0 s
|
50.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
1.0 %
|
2.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
3.1 %
|
19.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.95 %
|
83.09 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
89 %
|
Design
Height
|
164 mm
|
163.9 mm
|
Width
|
75.9 mm
|
74.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.7 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
221 grams
|
185 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.45 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 58 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 04m
|
15h 58m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 19m 52s
|
1h 52m 52s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.19 W/kg
|
Head: 1.18 W/kg Body: 1.44 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹11,499
|
₹13,999
|