|
75%
Samsung Galaxy F22
₹9,149
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy F22 vs Moto G42
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F22 vs Moto G42 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G42 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,528, while Samsung Galaxy F22 scores 1,344, making Moto G42 the better performer.
Display: Both Samsung Galaxy F22 and Moto G42 offer the same screen size of 6.4 inches, but Samsung Galaxy F22 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Moto G42's AMOLED, making Samsung Galaxy F22 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Moto G42 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F22 offers 48 MP, making Moto G42 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G42 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Samsung Galaxy F22 offers 13 MP, making Moto G42 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G42 delivers longer battery life with 18h 27m, while Samsung Galaxy F22 delivers 17h 37m, making Moto G42 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy F22 and Moto G42 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy F22 and Moto G42 equally at 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F22 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G42 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F22
₹9,149
@ Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
13 Jul, 2021
|
11 Jul, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(106,450 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(12,785 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
183,262
AnTuTu Score
|
243,481
AnTuTu Score
|
|
17h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹9,149
|
₹12,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 13, 2021
(Official)
|
Jul 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
183,262
|
243,481
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
45.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
3.6 %
|
16.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
600 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
274 ppi
|
411 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.52 %
|
83.89 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
160 mm
|
160.6 mm
|
Width
|
74 mm
|
73.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
203 grams
|
174.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 45 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 37m
|
18h 27m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 12m 15s
|
2h 8m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.02 W/kg Body: 1.2 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
₹9,149
|
₹12,999
|