|
74%
Samsung Galaxy M12
₹9,449
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Moto E40
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Moto E40 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy M12 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Moto E40 runs at 1.8 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy M12 the better performer.
Display: Both Samsung Galaxy M12 and Moto E40 offer the same screen size of 6.5 inches, but Moto E40 features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy M12's PLS TFT LCD, making Moto E40 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy M12 and Moto E40 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy M12 and Moto E40 feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M12 offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Moto E40 offers 5000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy M12 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy M12 and Moto E40 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy M12 and Moto E40 both receive the same user rating of 4.1.
|
Samsung Galaxy M12
₹9,449
@ Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
17 Mar, 2021
|
17 Oct, 2021
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 850
|
Unisoc T700
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(190,192 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(89,683 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
127,746
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
15h 26m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹9,449
|
₹10,799
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 17, 2021
(Official)
|
Oct 17, 2021
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 850
|
Unisoc T700
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A55
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
N/A
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MP1
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
127,746
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
36.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
10.4 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.95 %
|
81.72 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
87.5 %
|
Design
Height
|
164 mm
|
165.1 mm
|
Width
|
75.9 mm
|
75.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.7 mm
|
9.1 mm
|
Weight
|
221 grams
|
198 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 58 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
15h 26m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 8m 17s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.19 W/kg
|
Head: 0.34 W/kg Body: 1.35 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
₹9,449
|
₹10,799
|