|
72%
Samsung Galaxy M20
₹11,000
(Discontinued)
|
75%
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M20 vs Samsung Galaxy A50
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M20 vs Samsung Galaxy A50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy A50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,372, while Samsung Galaxy M20 scores 4,110, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M20 offers 6.3 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Samsung Galaxy M20's TFT, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 25 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M20 offers 13 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 25 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M20 offers 8 MP, making Samsung Galaxy A50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M20 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy A50 offers 4000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy M20 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy A50 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy M20 offers 32 GB, making Samsung Galaxy A50 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy M20 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Samsung Galaxy A50 is rated 7.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy A50 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy M20 has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M20
₹11,000
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A50
₹21,000
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
05 Feb, 2019
|
02 Mar, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
25 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
25 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(108,736 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(100,914 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
108,577
AnTuTu Score
|
143,399
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 11m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 02, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
14 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G71 MP2
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
108,577
|
143,399
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.44 %
|
84.97 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
91.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
156.4 mm
|
158.5 mm
|
Width
|
74.5 mm
|
74.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
7.7 mm
|
Weight
|
186 grams
|
166 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.91/2.8" sensor size S5K3L6 ISO-CELL 1.12µm pixel size |
25 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.726 mm focal length CMOS image sensor |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length 1/6" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera13 mm focal length |
|
N/A
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
5288 x 3968 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera25 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS |
Autofocus
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 29 Hours(3G)
|
Up to 23 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 11m
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.273 W/kg
|
Head: 0.335 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|