|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
Honor 9X 6GB RAM
₹19,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB vs Honor 9X 6GB RAM
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB vs Honor 9X 6GB RAM across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Honor 9X 6GB RAM scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,354, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB scores 1,273, making Honor 9X 6GB RAM the better performer.
Display: Honor 9X 6GB RAM offers a screen size of 6.59 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers 6.4 inches, making Honor 9X 6GB RAM the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB features a Super AMOLED display compared to Honor 9X 6GB RAM's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB and Honor 9X 6GB RAM feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB and Honor 9X 6GB RAM feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB delivers longer battery life with 14h 29m, while Honor 9X 6GB RAM delivers 13h 42m, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB and Honor 9X 6GB RAM offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Honor 9X 6GB RAM is rated 7.
User Rating: Honor 9X 6GB RAM receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Honor 9X 6GB RAM
₹19,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
18 Sep, 2019
|
19 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.59 inches (16.74 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(248,812 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(3,159 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 42m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
187,409
AnTuTu Score
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 18, 2019
(Official)
|
Jan 19, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
EMUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
HiSilicon Kirin 710F
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Mali-G51 MP4
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
187,409
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
8.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.4 %
|
25.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.59 inches (16.74 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
420 nits
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
391 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.02 %
|
84.28 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91 %
|
91 %
|
Design
Height
|
159 mm
|
163.5 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
77.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
196.8 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.827 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size IMX582 CMOS image sensor Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
16 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 49 Hours(4G)
|
Up to 24 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 29m
|
13h 42m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
4h 54m 37s
|
1h 37m 52s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.486 W/kg
|
Head: 0.78 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|