|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M30s
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M30s vs vivo S1 64GB
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M30s vs vivo S1 64GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo S1 64GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,037, while Samsung Galaxy M30s scores 1,273, making vivo S1 64GB the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy M30s offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while vivo S1 64GB offers 6.38 inches, making Samsung Galaxy M30s the larger display of the two. Both Samsung Galaxy M30s and vivo S1 64GB feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M30s offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while vivo S1 64GB offers 16 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M30s better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo S1 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M30s offers 16 MP, making vivo S1 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M30s delivers longer battery life with 14h 29m, while vivo S1 64GB delivers 12h 55m, making Samsung Galaxy M30s the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy M30s and vivo S1 64GB offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: vivo S1 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy M30s has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M30s
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
18 Sep, 2019
|
09 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(252,791 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(7,064 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
135,678
AnTuTu Score
|
146,341
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 18, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Mali-G52
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
135,678
|
146,341
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.4 %
|
14.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
420 nits
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
404 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.02 %
|
83.12 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91 %
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
159 mm
|
159.5 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
75.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
179 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 49 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 29m
|
12h 55m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
4h 54m 37s
|
1h 52m 11s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.486 W/kg
|
Head: 0.756 W/kg Body: 0.335 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|