|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M30s
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M30s vs vivo Z1 Pro
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M30s vs vivo Z1 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo Z1 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 3,262, while Samsung Galaxy M30s scores 1,273, making vivo Z1 Pro the better performer.
Display: vivo Z1 Pro offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M30s offers 6.4 inches, making vivo Z1 Pro the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a Super AMOLED display compared to vivo Z1 Pro's IPS LCD, making Samsung Galaxy M30s the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M30s offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while vivo Z1 Pro offers 16 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M30s better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M30s offers 16 MP, making vivo Z1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M30s offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while vivo Z1 Pro offers 5000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy M30s better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy M30s and vivo Z1 Pro offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy M30s and vivo Z1 Pro equally at 8.
User Rating: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Samsung Galaxy M30s has a rating of 4.2.
|
Samsung Galaxy M30s
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
18 Sep, 2019
|
03 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Snapdragon 712
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(252,791 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(360,568 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
135,678
AnTuTu Score
|
109,750
AnTuTu Score
|
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 18, 2019
(Official)
|
Jul 03, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
10 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 616
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|