|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M40
₹15,798
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
OPPO F11 Pro 128GB
₹29,987
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M40 vs OPPO F11 Pro 128GB
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M40 vs OPPO F11 Pro 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy M40 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,576, while OPPO F11 Pro 128GB scores 5,900, making Samsung Galaxy M40 the better performer.
Display: OPPO F11 Pro 128GB offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 6.3 inches, making OPPO F11 Pro 128GB the larger display of the two. OPPO F11 Pro 128GB features a TFT LTPS display compared to Samsung Galaxy M40's PLS TFT LCD, making OPPO F11 Pro 128GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: OPPO F11 Pro 128GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 32 MP, making OPPO F11 Pro 128GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy M40 and OPPO F11 Pro 128GB feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: OPPO F11 Pro 128GB delivers longer battery life with 10h 55m, while Samsung Galaxy M40 delivers 9h 12m, making OPPO F11 Pro 128GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy M40 and OPPO F11 Pro 128GB offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Samsung Galaxy M40 and OPPO F11 Pro 128GB equally at 7.
User Rating: OPPO F11 Pro 128GB receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Samsung Galaxy M40 has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M40
₹15,798
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO F11 Pro 128GB
₹29,987
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
18 Jun, 2019
|
13 May, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
TFT LTPS
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(18,912 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(138,384 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
173,420
AnTuTu Score
|
149,995
AnTuTu Score
|
|
9h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
10h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 18, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
173,420
|
149,995
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
23.3 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
TFT LTPS
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
396 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.71 %
|
84.31 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.8 %
|
90.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
155.3 mm
|
161.3 mm
|
Width
|
73.9 mm
|
76.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
168 grams
|
190 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.71/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.794.73 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera2.17 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
6500 x 4920 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size CMOS |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.41 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 29 Hours(4G)
|
Up to 26.7 Hours(3G) / Up to 36 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
9h 12m
|
10h 55m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 27m 34s
|
1h 9m 53s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.200 W/kg
|
Head: 1.323 W/kg Body: 0.922 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|