|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M40
₹15,798
(Out of Stock)
|
76%
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M40 vs vivo S1 64GB
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M40 vs vivo S1 64GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy M40 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,576, while vivo S1 64GB scores 6,037, making Samsung Galaxy M40 the better performer.
Display: vivo S1 64GB offers a screen size of 6.38 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 6.3 inches, making vivo S1 64GB the larger display of the two. vivo S1 64GB features a Super AMOLED display compared to Samsung Galaxy M40's PLS TFT LCD, making vivo S1 64GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M40 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 32 MP, while vivo S1 64GB offers 16 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M40 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo S1 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 16 MP, making vivo S1 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo S1 64GB delivers longer battery life with 12h 55m, while Samsung Galaxy M40 delivers 9h 12m, making vivo S1 64GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: vivo S1 64GB offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 128 GB, making vivo S1 64GB the better option for storage.
User Rating: vivo S1 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy M40 has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M40
₹15,798
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
18 Jun, 2019
|
09 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(18,912 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(7,064 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
173,420
AnTuTu Score
|
146,341
AnTuTu Score
|
|
9h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 18, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Mali-G52
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
173,420
|
146,341
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
14.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
404 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.71 %
|
83.12 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.8 %
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
155.3 mm
|
159.5 mm
|
Width
|
73.9 mm
|
75.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.1 mm
|
Weight
|
168 grams
|
179 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.71/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
6500 x 4920 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size CMOS |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 29 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
9h 12m
|
12h 55m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 27m 34s
|
1h 52m 11s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.200 W/kg
|
Head: 0.756 W/kg Body: 0.335 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
N/A
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|