|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M40
₹15,798
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy M40 vs vivo Z1 Pro
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M40 vs vivo Z1 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy M40 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,576, while vivo Z1 Pro scores 3,262, making Samsung Galaxy M40 the better performer.
Display: vivo Z1 Pro offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 6.3 inches, making vivo Z1 Pro the larger display of the two. vivo Z1 Pro features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy M40's PLS TFT LCD, making vivo Z1 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M40 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 32 MP, while vivo Z1 Pro offers 16 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M40 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 16 MP, making vivo Z1 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo Z1 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 3500 mAh, making vivo Z1 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: vivo Z1 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy M40 offers 128 GB, making vivo Z1 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Samsung Galaxy M40 is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo Z1 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Samsung Galaxy M40 has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M40
₹15,798
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo Z1 Pro
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
18 Jun, 2019
|
03 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
Snapdragon 712
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
15W Fast Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(18,912 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(360,568 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
173,420
AnTuTu Score
|
109,750
AnTuTu Score
|
|
9h 12m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 18, 2019
(Official)
|
Jul 03, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Samsung One UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Adreno 616
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
173,420
|
109,750
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
19.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
PLS TFT LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.71 %
|
83.17 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.8 %
|
90.77 %
|
Design
Height
|
155.3 mm
|
162.39 mm
|
Width
|
73.9 mm
|
77.33 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.9 mm
|
8.85 mm
|
Weight
|
168 grams
|
201 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.71/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length |
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
6500 x 4920 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size CMOS |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 29 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
9h 12m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 27m 34s
|
1h 49m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.200 W/kg
|
Head: 0.752 W/kg Body: 0.402 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|