Samsung Z2
₹4,790
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava 4G Connect M1
₹2,810
(Discontinued)
|
vivo X300 Ultra
₹159,999
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Z2 vs Lava 4G Connect M1
Comparing the Samsung Z2 vs Lava 4G Connect M1 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Z2 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while Lava 4G Connect M1 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Samsung Z2 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Z2 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Lava 4G Connect M1 offers 2.4 inches, making Samsung Z2 the larger display of the two. Both Samsung Z2 and Lava 4G Connect M1 feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Samsung Z2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Lava 4G Connect M1 offers 0.3 MP, making Samsung Z2 better for rear camera photography.
Battery: Lava 4G Connect M1 offers a higher battery capacity with 1750 mAh, while Samsung Z2 offers 1500 mAh, making Lava 4G Connect M1 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Z2 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Lava 4G Connect M1 offers 4 GB, making Samsung Z2 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Samsung Z2 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while Lava 4G Connect M1 has a rating of 2.2.
|
✕
Samsung Z2
₹4,790
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Lava 4G Connect M1
₹2,810
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
29 Aug, 2016
|
14 Feb, 2017
|
14 May, 2026
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
Spreadtrum SC9830A
|
N/A
|
Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.5 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 4.61 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
16 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
AMOLED
|
|
480x800 px
|
240x320 px
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera
|
200 MP
Primary Camera (upto 3.7x Optical Zoom)
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
200 MP
Telephoto Camera
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
50 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
N/A
|
50 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1750 mAh
|
6600 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
100W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
512 GB
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
8.7/10
|
Pros
|
|
|
Cons
|
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(11,588 ratings)
|
2.2/5
(10 ratings)
|
4.6/5
(29 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3,977,648
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
15h 10m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹159,999
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Aug 29, 2016
(Official)
|
N/A
|
May 06, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Tizen v2.4
|
MocorDroid v6.0
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7 Year
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Origin OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Best In Class
|
Chipset
|
Spreadtrum SC9830A
|
N/A
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SM8850-AC
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Octa core
4.61 GHz, Dual core, Oryon 3.62 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
N/A
|
Adreno 840
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
16 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3,977,648
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
14.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6,450
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
21.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
240x320 px
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
4500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
19.8:9
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
167 ppi
|
510 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
59.5 %
|
27.89 %
|
89.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
94.49 %
|
Display Colour
|
16M
|
65K
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
121.5 mm
|
123 mm
|
162.98 mm
|
Width
|
63 mm
|
52 mm
|
76.81 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.8 mm
|
14.5 mm
|
8.19 mm
|
Weight
|
127 grams
|
N/A
|
232 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Back: Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Best In Class
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
200 MP
Primary Camera105x Digital Zoom 3.7x Optical Zoomf/1.8535 mm focal length LYT 901 0.7µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
200 MP
f/2.67 Telephoto Camera85 mm focal length 1/1.28" sensor size |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
50 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera14 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
No
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
640 x 480 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
N/A
|
105 x Digital Zoom
3.7 x Optical Zoom |
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
8k @30 fps
4k @30/60/120 fps Full HD @30/60/120 fps |
Front Camera
Battery
Battery Test Results
Storage
Network & Connectivity
Multimedia
Sensors
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹159,999
|