Sony Ericsson K810
|
Samsung G800
|
vivo X300 Ultra
₹159,999
|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Sony Ericsson K810 vs Samsung G800
Share
Comparing the Sony Ericsson K810 vs Samsung G800 across camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Rear Camera: Samsung G800 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Sony Ericsson K810 offers 3.2 MP, making Samsung G800 better for rear camera photography.
Storage: Sony Ericsson K810 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung G800 offers 160 GB, making Sony Ericsson K810 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Sony Ericsson K810
|
✕
Samsung G800
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
01 Feb, 2007
|
01 Dec, 2007
|
14 May, 2026
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
8.7/10
|
Pros
|
|
|
Cons
|
|
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
4.6/5
(29 ratings)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹159,999
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
May 06, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
5 Year
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7 Year
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Origin OS
|
Performance
Chipset
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 SM8850-AC
|
Processor
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Octa core
4.61 GHz, Dual core, Oryon 3.62 GHz, Hexa Core, Oryon |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Adreno 840
|
RAM
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
16 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
LPDDR5X Ultra
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
3,977,648
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
14.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6,450
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
21.7 %
|
Display
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
Resolution
|
320.00x320 pixels 4.21.90.7 inches px
|
320.00x 320 pixels 2.4 inches px
|
1440x3168 px (QHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
4500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
144 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
19.8:9
|
Pixel Density
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
510 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
89.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
94.49 %
|
Design
Height
|
106.00 mm
|
101.00 mm
|
162.98 mm
|
Width
|
48.00 mm
|
51.10 mm
|
76.81 mm
|
Thickness
|
17.00 mm
|
18.80 mm
|
8.19 mm
|
Weight
|
103 grams
|
134 grams
|
232 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Back: Glass
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
200 MP
Primary Camera105x Digital Zoom 3.7x Optical Zoomf/1.8535 mm focal length LYT 901 0.7µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
200 MP
f/2.67 Telephoto Camera85 mm focal length 1/1.28" sensor size |
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
50 MP
f/2.0 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera14 mm focal length |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
105 x Digital Zoom
3.7 x Optical Zoom |
Video Recording
|
220x176
1280x1024 |
320x240 @ 15
|
8k @30 fps
4k @30/60/120 fps Full HD @30/60/120 fps |
Front Camera
Resolution
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
50 MP
f/2.45 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Capacity
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
6600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 10(2G)
|
Up to 3.33(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes 100W Flash Charging
|
Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Yes 40W Wireless Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
15h 10m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
0h 36m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 MB
|
160 MB
|
512 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
UFS 4.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 2 GB
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Network & Connectivity
Multimedia
Sensors
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹159,999
|