|
73%
Tecno Phantom 9
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
79%
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Phantom 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
Comparing the Tecno Phantom 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 10,792, while Tecno Phantom 9 scores 4,428, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro the better performer.
Display: Tecno Phantom 9 offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offers 6.39 inches, making Tecno Phantom 9 the larger display of the two. Both Tecno Phantom 9 and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Tecno Phantom 9 offers 16 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Tecno Phantom 9 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offers 20 MP, making Tecno Phantom 9 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro delivers longer battery life with 13h 45m, while Tecno Phantom 9 delivers 10h 04m, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Tecno Phantom 9 and Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Tecno Phantom 9 has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Tecno Phantom 9
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
₹20,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
73%
|
79%
|
Release Date
|
17 Jul, 2019
|
22 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Snapdragon 855
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.84 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
13 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
20 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(1,050 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(90,160 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
87,730
AnTuTu Score
|
373,945
AnTuTu Score
|
|
10h 04m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 45m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 17, 2019
(Official)
|
Jul 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P35
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2.84 GHz, Single core, Kryo 485 2.42 GHz, Tri core, Kryo 485 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 485 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Adreno 640
|
RAM
|
6 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
87,730
|
373,945
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
12.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
12.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
21.3 %
|
22.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.12 %
|
85.9 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
158.4 mm
|
156.7 mm
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
74.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
164 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.85CMOS image sensor |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.75 Wide Angle1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
13 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.8 Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Laser Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary CameraCMOS |
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/3.4" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes Quick Charging v4.0 58% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
10h 04m
|
13h 45m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
6h 56m 19s
|
1h 12m 46s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.03 W/kg Body: 0.72 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|