|
76%
Tecno Pova 3
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Moto G42
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Pova 3 vs Moto G42
Comparing the Tecno Pova 3 vs Moto G42 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G42 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,528, while Tecno Pova 3 scores 1,295, making Moto G42 the better performer.
Display: Tecno Pova 3 offers a screen size of 6.9 inches, while Moto G42 offers 6.4 inches, making Tecno Pova 3 the larger display of the two. Moto G42 features a AMOLED display compared to Tecno Pova 3's IPS LCD, making Moto G42 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Tecno Pova 3 and Moto G42 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto G42 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Tecno Pova 3 offers 8 MP, making Moto G42 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G42 delivers longer battery life with 18h 27m, while Tecno Pova 3 delivers 14h 44m, making Moto G42 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Tecno Pova 3 and Moto G42 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Moto G42 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Tecno Pova 3 has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Tecno Pova 3
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Moto G42
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
27 Jun, 2022
|
11 Jul, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G88
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
7000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Flash Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(4,035 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(12,785 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
14h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
243,481
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 27, 2022
(Official)
|
Jul 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
HiOS
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G88
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
243,481
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
26.3 %
|
16.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.9 inches (17.53 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
389 ppi
|
411 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.43 %
|
83.89 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
173.1 mm
|
160.6 mm
|
Width
|
78.4 mm
|
73.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
230 grams
|
174.5 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 Wide Angle |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
2k @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
7000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging 50% in 40 minutes
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
14h 44m
|
18h 27m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 57m 41s
|
2h 8m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.02 W/kg Body: 1.2 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|