|
72%
Tecno Pova
₹10,449
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Pova vs Moto G9 Power
Comparing the Tecno Pova vs Moto G9 Power across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto G9 Power scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,408, while Tecno Pova scores 1,362, making Moto G9 Power the better performer.
Display: Both Tecno Pova and Moto G9 Power offer the same screen size of 6.8 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while Tecno Pova offers 16 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Tecno Pova offers 8 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G9 Power delivers longer battery life with 28h 44m, while Tecno Pova delivers 20h 32m, making Moto G9 Power the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Tecno Pova and Moto G9 Power offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Tecno Pova and Moto G9 Power equally at 7.
User Rating: Tecno Pova receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Moto G9 Power has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Tecno Pova
₹10,449
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
11 Dec, 2020
|
15 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Flash Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(10,899 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(32,482 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
195,498
AnTuTu Score
|
169,608
AnTuTu Score
|
|
20h 32m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
28h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 11, 2020
(Official)
|
Dec 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Stock
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
195,498
|
169,608
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 s
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
56.7 %
|
61.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20.5:9
|
20.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
263 ppi
|
263 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.88 %
|
83.31 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.4 %
|
85 %
|
Design
Height
|
171.2 mm
|
172.1 mm
|
Width
|
77.5 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
215.5 grams
|
221 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.85 |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 0.7µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.25 Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Flash Charging
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
20h 32m
|
28h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 2m 48s
|
3h 48m 56s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.039 W/kg Body: 1.145 W/kg
|
Head: 0.98 W/kg Body: 1.33 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|