|
62%
Ulefone Tiger
₹13,986
(Discontinued)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Ulefone Tiger vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the Ulefone Tiger vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while Ulefone Tiger runs at 1.3 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while Ulefone Tiger offers 5.5 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both Ulefone Tiger and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Ulefone Tiger and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Ulefone Tiger and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Ulefone Tiger offers 4200 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Ulefone Tiger offers 16 GB, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better option for storage.
|
✕
Ulefone Tiger
₹13,986
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
62%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
10 Apr, 2017
|
30 Jul, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4200 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v6.0 (Marshmallow)
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6737
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-T720 MP2
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Thickness
|
N/A
|
8.49 mm
|
Build Material
|
Frame: Metal
Back: Metal |
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraExmor-R CMOS image sensor |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
No
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4200 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m 0s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Back
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|