|
79%
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi K20
₹22,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo V17 vs Xiaomi Redmi K20
Comparing the vivo V17 vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi K20 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,793, while vivo V17 scores 1,651, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the better performer.
Display: vivo V17 offers a screen size of 6.44 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi K20 offers 6.39 inches, making vivo V17 the larger display of the two. vivo V17 features a Super AMOLED display compared to Xiaomi Redmi K20's AMOLED, making vivo V17 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo V17 and Xiaomi Redmi K20 feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo V17 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi K20 offers 20 MP, making vivo V17 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi K20 delivers longer battery life with 13h 38m, while vivo V17 delivers 12h 09m, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi K20 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo V17 offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi K20 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo V17 and Xiaomi Redmi K20 equally at 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi K20 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while vivo V17 has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi K20
₹22,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
10 Dec, 2019
|
22 Jul, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
Snapdragon 730
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
13 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
8 MP
Telephoto Camera (upto 2x Optical Zoom)
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
20 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
18W Quick Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(13,957 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(53,168 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
227,722
AnTuTu Score
|
209,539
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 09m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
13h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 10, 2019
(Official)
|
Jul 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
8 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
227,722
|
209,539
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
15.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
11.0 %
|
12.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
33.7 %
|
22.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.39 inches (16.23 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.99 %
|
85.9 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.38 %
|
91.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
159 mm
|
156.7 mm
|
Width
|
74.1 mm
|
74.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
176 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size IMX582 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.751/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
13 MP
f/2.4 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.4 Telephoto Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera23 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
20 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1/3.4" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Camera Type
|
N/A
|
Pop-Up
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging v3.0
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 09m
|
13h 38m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 46m 18s
|
1h 38m 18s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.251 W/kg
|
Head: 1.07 W/kg Body: 0.723 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|