XOLO Omega 5.0
₹8,990
(Out of Stock)
|
67%
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Omega 5.0 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G
Comparing the XOLO Omega 5.0 vs Itel A100 Pro 4G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Itel A100 Pro 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.82 GHz, while XOLO Omega 5.0 runs at 1.4 GHz, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the better performer.
Display: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while XOLO Omega 5.0 offers 5 inches, making Itel A100 Pro 4G the larger display of the two. Both XOLO Omega 5.0 and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both XOLO Omega 5.0 and Itel A100 Pro 4G feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while XOLO Omega 5.0 offers 2 MP, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Itel A100 Pro 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while XOLO Omega 5.0 offers 2100 mAh, making Itel A100 Pro 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: XOLO Omega 5.0 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Itel A100 Pro 4G offers 64 GB, making XOLO Omega 5.0 the better option for storage.
|
✕
XOLO Omega 5.0
₹8,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Itel A100 Pro 4G
₹8,999
(Upcoming)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
20 Dec, 2014
|
31 Aug, 2026
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6592M
|
Unisoc T7100
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.82 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2100 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
10W
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.6/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(582 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
203,558
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 20, 2014
(Official)
|
May 19, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v15
|
Custom UI
|
Hive UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6592M
|
Unisoc T7100
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.4 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core
1.82 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.82 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-450 MP4
|
Mali-G52 MP2
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
203,558
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
33.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
256 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
66.43 %
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
144 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
72 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
10.5 mm
|
8.49 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraExmor-R CMOS image sensor |
8 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2100 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 7.7 Hours(3G) / Up to 22 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes 10W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 4m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/e/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
N/A
|