|
72%
Xiaomi Mi4
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
72%
Samsung Galaxy M20
₹11,000
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Mi4 vs Samsung Galaxy M20
Comparing the Xiaomi Mi4 vs Samsung Galaxy M20 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Mi4 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.5 GHz, while Samsung Galaxy M20 runs at 1.8 GHz, making Xiaomi Mi4 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy M20 offers a screen size of 6.3 inches, while Xiaomi Mi4 offers 5 inches, making Samsung Galaxy M20 the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Mi4 features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy M20's TFT, making Xiaomi Mi4 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Mi4 and Samsung Galaxy M20 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Mi4 and Samsung Galaxy M20 feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M20 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Xiaomi Mi4 offers 3080 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy M20 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy M20 offers higher internal storage with 32 GB, while Xiaomi Mi4 offers 16 GB, making Samsung Galaxy M20 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Xiaomi Mi4 and Samsung Galaxy M20 both receive the same user rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Xiaomi Mi4
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M20
₹11,000
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
10 Feb, 2015
|
05 Feb, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 801
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2.5 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
5 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3080 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(27,948 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(108,736 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
108,577
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
19h 11m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 10, 2015
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.3 (Kitkat)
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
|
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2.5 GHz, Krait 400
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
14 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 330
|
Mali-G71 MP2
|
RAM
|
3 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
108,577
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
441 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
72.11 %
|
83.44 %
|
Screen Protection
|
No
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
139.2 mm
|
156.4 mm
|
Width
|
68.5 mm
|
74.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.8 mm
|
Weight
|
149 grams
|
186 grams
|
Build Material
|
Frame: Stainless steel
Back: Stainless steel |
Back: Plastic
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3080 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 29 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v2.0
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
19h 11m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.92 W/kg Body: 1.36 W/kg
|
Head: 0.273 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Barometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|