Xiaomi Redmi 9i vs POCO C3 64GB

Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi 9i vs POCO C3 64GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: POCO C3 64GB runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while Xiaomi Redmi 9i runs at 2.0 GHz, making POCO C3 64GB the better performer.

Display: Both Xiaomi Redmi 9i and POCO C3 64GB offer the same screen size of 6.53 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.

Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi 9i and POCO C3 64GB feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.

Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi 9i and POCO C3 64GB feature a 5 MP primary front camera.

Battery: Both Xiaomi Redmi 9i and POCO C3 64GB offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.

Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi 9i and POCO C3 64GB offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.

User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi 9i and POCO C3 64GB both receive the same user rating of 4.3.

Xiaomi Redmi 9i

₹9,999

(Out of Stock)

POCO C3 64GB

₹8,499

(Out of Stock)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

66%

69%

Release Date

15 Sep, 2020

16 Oct, 2020

Performance


MediaTek Helio G25	MediaTek Helio G35
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)	Tru-Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
4 GB RAM	4 GB RAM

Display


6.53 inches (16.59 cm)	6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
IPS LCD	IPS LCD
720x1600 px (HD+)	720x1600 px (HD+)

Rear Camera


13 MP Primary Camera	13 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera
N/A	2 MP Depth Camera
N/A	2 MP Macro Camera

Front Camera


5 MP	5 MP

Battery


5000 mAh	5000 mAh
N/A	No Wireless Charging

Storage

64 GB	64 GB
N/A	eMMC 5.1

Expert Review

N/A	7.0/10 Read Expert Review

Pros

Device yet to be reviewed

Trendy design
Good battery life
Smooth performance

Cons

Device yet to be reviewed

Night shots could do with some improvement
No Type-C port
No fingerprint sensor

User Ratings

4.3/5

(587,088 ratings)

4.3/5

(309,618 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

N/A	18h 46m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Video

There are no videos available for the device.

1 More Video

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Sep 15, 2020

(Official)

Oct 16, 2020

(Official)

Operating System

Android v10 (Q)

Custom UI

MIUI

Performance

Performance Rating

Avg

Good

Chipset

MediaTek Helio G25

MediaTek Helio G35

Processor

Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53

Octa core, 2.3 GHz, Cortex A53

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

12 nm

Graphics (GPU)

PowerVR GE8320

RAM

4 GB	3 GB / 4 GB

RAM Type

N/A

LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

N/A

37.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

N/A

4.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

N/A

24.3 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Very Good

Display Type

IPS LCD

Screen Size

6.53 inches (16.59 cm)

Resolution

720x1600 px (HD+)

Brightness

270 nits

400 nits

Aspect Ratio

20:9

Pixel Density

269 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

81.01 %

81.08 %

Screen Protection

N/A

Yes

Bezel-less Display

Yes with waterdrop notch

Design

Height

164.9 mm

Width

77.07 mm

77 mm

Thickness

9 mm

Weight

194 grams

Water Resistance

Yes Splash proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Good

Resolution

13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21µm pixel size

13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle28 mm focal length 1µm pixel size

N/A	2 MP f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size

N/A	2 MP f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size

Autofocus

Yes Phase Detection Autofocus

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

4128 x 3096 Pixels

Settings

Exposure compensation ISO control

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Touch to focus

Video Recording

Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps

Full HD @30 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Good

Very Good

Resolution

5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size

Flash

Yes Screen flash

Video Recording

N/A	Full HD @30 fps

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good

Capacity

5000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-Polymer

TalkTime

N/A	Up to 37 Hours(4G)

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

N/A

18h 46m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

N/A

2h 45m 1s

Storage

Internal Storage

64 GB / 128 GB

32 GB / 64 GB

Storage Type

N/A

eMMC 5.1

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 512 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G Not Supported 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

SIM 2

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)

SAR Value

Head: 0.528 W/kg Body: 0.791 W/kg

Head: 0.506 W/kg Body: 0.833 W/kg

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)

Wi-Fi Features

Mobile Hotspot

Bluetooth

Yes v5.0

GPS

Yes with A-GPS Glonass

NFC

N/A

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor

Other Sensors

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer