|
67%
Xiaomi Redmi A1
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
67%
Tecno Pop 5 Pro
₹6,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi A1 vs Tecno Pop 5 Pro
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi A1 vs Tecno Pop 5 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Tecno Pop 5 Pro run at the same processing speed of 2.0 GHz.
Display: Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Tecno Pop 5 Pro offer the same screen size of 6.52 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Tecno Pop 5 Pro feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Tecno Pop 5 Pro feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Tecno Pop 5 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Xiaomi Redmi A1 offers 5000 mAh, making Tecno Pop 5 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi A1 and Tecno Pop 5 Pro offer the same internal storage of 32 GB.
User Rating: Tecno Pop 5 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Xiaomi Redmi A1 has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi A1
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Tecno Pop 5 Pro
₹6,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
67%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
09 Sep, 2022
|
19 Jan, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera
|
0.08 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(21,823 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(680 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
89,878
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
13h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 09, 2022
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
Android Go
|
Android Go
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
89,878
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
33.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
15.6 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
400 nits
|
480 nits
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
120 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
269 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.15 %
|
81.94 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
88.89 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
164.9 mm
|
164.8 mm
|
Width
|
76.7 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
9.5 mm
|
Weight
|
192 grams
|
N/A
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera |
0.08 MP
|
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 31.5 Hours(4G)
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
13h 29m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 39m 50s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|