|
76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
realme Narzo 50
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T vs realme Narzo 50
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T vs realme Narzo 50 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,696, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T scores 1,660, making realme Narzo 50 the better performer.
Display: realme Narzo 50 offers a screen size of 6.6 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T offers 6.5 inches, making realme Narzo 50 the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T and realme Narzo 50 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme Narzo 50 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T offers 48 MP, making realme Narzo 50 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: realme Narzo 50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T offers 8 MP, making realme Narzo 50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T and realme Narzo 50 offer the same 5000 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T and realme Narzo 50 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T and realme Narzo 50 equally at 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T and realme Narzo 50 both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10T
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
realme Narzo 50
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
26 Jul, 2021
|
03 Mar, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 700
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2412 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
33W Dart Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(262,430 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(19,281 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
359,003
AnTuTu Score
|
348,006
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
16h 14m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 26, 2021
(Official)
|
Mar 03, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
7 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
359,003
|
348,006
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
28.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2412 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
500 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
180 Hz
|
240 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
400 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.72 %
|
84.88 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91 %
|
90.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
161.8 mm
|
164.1 mm
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
75.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.5 mm
|
Weight
|
190 grams
|
194 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle1/2" sensor size OV48B 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Beautify |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Movie Frame
Video Pro Mode Macro Video Kaleidoscope Short Video Mode |
Dual Video Recording
Ultra Steady Video |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.05 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Dart Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
16h 14m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 42s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.863 W/kg Body: 0.802 W/kg
|
Head: 1.184 W/kg Body: 0.824 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|