|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G vs Moto G42
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G vs Moto G42 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,639, while Moto G42 scores 1,528, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers a screen size of 6.43 inches, while Moto G42 offers 6.4 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G and Moto G42 feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G and Moto G42 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Moto G42 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers 13 MP, making Moto G42 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Moto G42 delivers longer battery life with 18h 27m, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G delivers 16h 43m, making Moto G42 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G and Moto G42 offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G and Moto G42 equally at 7.
User Rating: Moto G42 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G has a rating of 4.1.
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
11 Feb, 2022
|
11 Jul, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 680
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
33W Fast Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(71,050 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(12,785 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
269,010
AnTuTu Score
|
243,481
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 43m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 27m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹12,999
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Jul 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
269,010
|
243,481
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
23.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
3.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
13.8 %
|
16.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
1000 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
411 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.64 %
|
83.89 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.9 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.8 mm
|
160.6 mm
|
Width
|
73.8 mm
|
73.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
179 grams
|
174.5 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle0.64µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Movie Frame
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 60 minutes
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 43m
|
18h 27m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 9m 1s
|
2h 8m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.02 W/kg Body: 1.2 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹12,999
|