|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM
₹7,999
(Out of Stock)
|
73%
HMD Vibe 2 5G
₹11,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM vs HMD Vibe 2 5G
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM vs HMD Vibe 2 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: HMD Vibe 2 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,725, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM scores 1,323, making HMD Vibe 2 5G the better performer.
Display: HMD Vibe 2 5G offers a screen size of 6.75 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM offers 6.3 inches, making HMD Vibe 2 5G the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM and HMD Vibe 2 5G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: HMD Vibe 2 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM offers 48 MP, making HMD Vibe 2 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM offers a higher front camera resolution with 13 MP, while HMD Vibe 2 5G offers 8 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM better for front camera photography.
Battery: HMD Vibe 2 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM offers 4000 mAh, making HMD Vibe 2 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: HMD Vibe 2 5G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM offers 32 GB, making HMD Vibe 2 5G the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM and HMD Vibe 2 5G equally at 8.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM and HMD Vibe 2 5G both receive the same user rating of 4.4.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 3GB RAM
₹7,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
HMD Vibe 2 5G
₹11,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
73%
|
Release Date
|
18 Nov, 2019
|
26 May, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Unisoc T8200
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
| Snapdragon 665 vs Unisoc T8200 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
18W
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(420 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(11,589 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
511,972
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
10h 42m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Nov 18, 2019
(Official)
|
May 21, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v16
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Year
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
Unisoc T8200 T8200
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
511,972
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
20.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
313
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
23.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.75 inches (17.15 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
265 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.56 %
|
84.27 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
158.3 mm
|
168 mm
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
77.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
8.6 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
210 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IP64
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Camera |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
N/A
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
N/A
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Filters
Smile detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 24 Hours(2G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 18W
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
10h 42m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
2h 17m 9s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.13 W/kg Body: 0.634 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm, USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|