|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
₹12,999
|
72%
Tecno Spark Power
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Tecno Spark Power
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Tecno Spark Power across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,323, while Tecno Spark Power scores 843, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 the better performer.
Display: Tecno Spark Power offers a screen size of 6.35 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 offers 6.3 inches, making Tecno Spark Power the larger display of the two. Tecno Spark Power features a AMOLED display compared to Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's IPS LCD, making Tecno Spark Power the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Tecno Spark Power offers 13 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 and Tecno Spark Power feature a 13 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Tecno Spark Power offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 offers 4000 mAh, making Tecno Spark Power better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 and Tecno Spark Power offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Tecno Spark Power is rated 7.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 and Tecno Spark Power both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
₹12,999
@ Amazon
|
✕
Tecno Spark Power
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
21 Oct, 2019
|
26 Nov, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.35 inches (16.13 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1548 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
|
13 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(104,570 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(6,673 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
171,024
AnTuTu Score
|
96,849
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
17h 00m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
|
Not Available in any store
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Oct 21, 2019
(Official)
|
Nov 26, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
171,024
|
96,849
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
13.7 %
|
16.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.35 inches (16.13 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1548 px (HD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.56 %
|
83.16 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
91 %
|
Design
Height
|
158.3 mm
|
158.5 mm
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
75.98 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
9.17 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
198.2 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
13 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/2.0 |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
Macro Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @120 fps |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
13 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
17h 00m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 43m 16s
|
4h 1m 21s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.13 W/kg Body: 0.634 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Compare Prices
|
₹12,999
|
Not Available in any store
|