|
66%
Xiaomi Redmi Note
₹10,833
(Discontinued)
|
65%
Coolpad F2 8675
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Coolpad F2 8675
Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Note vs Coolpad F2 8675 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Coolpad F2 8675 run at the same processing speed of 1.7 GHz.
Display: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Coolpad F2 8675 offer the same screen size of 5.5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Coolpad F2 8675 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Note and Coolpad F2 8675 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note offers a higher battery capacity with 3100 mAh, while Coolpad F2 8675 offers 2500 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi Note better for longer battery life.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi Note offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Coolpad F2 8675 offers 16 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi Note the better option for storage.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Coolpad F2 8675 has a rating of 4.
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note
₹10,833
(Discontinued)
|
Coolpad F2 8675
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
65%
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.7 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.7 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3100 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(10,298 ratings)
|
4/5
(1 rating)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.7 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Octa core, 1.7 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-450
|
Mali-450 MP4
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
2 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
267 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.65 %
|
69.15 %
|
Design
Height
|
154 mm
|
154.5 mm
|
Width
|
78.7 mm
|
78 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
8.6 mm
|
Weight
|
199 grams
|
154 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.228 mm focal length |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2Back-illuminated sensor BSI |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4320 x 3240 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
1280x720 fps
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3100 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.875 W/kg Body: 0.579 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|