Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 vs vivo T5 Pro

Comparing the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 vs vivo T5 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,657, while vivo T5 Pro scores 3,146, making Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 the better performer.

Display: vivo T5 Pro offers a screen size of 6.83 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 offers 6.59 inches, making vivo T5 Pro the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 and vivo T5 Pro feature the same AMOLED display.

Rear Camera: Both Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 and vivo T5 Pro feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.

Front Camera: vivo T5 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 offers 20 MP, making vivo T5 Pro better for front camera photography.

Battery: vivo T5 Pro delivers longer battery life with 18h 39m, while Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 delivers 16h 00m, making vivo T5 Pro the better pick for all day usage.

Storage: Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while vivo T5 Pro offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 the better option for storage.

Expert Review: vivo T5 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8.5 from the editorial team, while Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 is rated 8.4.

User Rating: vivo T5 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 has a rating of 4.1.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5

₹37,999

@ Amazon

vivo T5 Pro

₹35,999

@ Amazon

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Spec Score

89%

82%

Release Date

19 Jun, 2026

21 Apr, 2026

Performance


MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra	Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Octa Core (upto 3.4 GHz)	Octa Core (upto 2.7 GHz)
8 GB RAM	8 GB RAM

Display


6.59 inches (16.74 cm)	6.83 inches (17.35 cm)
AMOLED	AMOLED
1268x2756 px (FHD+)	1260x2800 px (FHD+)
120 Hz Refresh Rate	144 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera


50 MP Wide Angle Primary Camera	50 MP Primary Camera
8 MP Ultra-Wide Angle Camera	2 MP Depth Camera

Front Camera


20 MP Wide Angle Lens	32 MP

Battery


7540 mAh	9020 mAh
100W Hyper Charging	90W
No Wireless Charging	N/A

Storage

256 GB	128 GB
UFS 4.1	UFS 3.1

Expert Review

8.4/10

Read Expert Review

8.5/10

Read Expert Review

Pros

Premium build with class-leading durability
Bright, immersive display
Excellent gaming & overall performance
Massive battery & fast charging

Feels light despite huge battery
Sharp, vibrant display
Decent primary camera
Excellent battery life

Cons

Too many pre-installed apps
Thermal management needs improvement

Inconsistent low light colours
No telephoto lens

User Ratings

4.1/5

(132 ratings)

4.5/5

(6,732 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

2,135,669 AnTuTu Score	1,167,242 AnTuTu Score
16h 00m Battery Life (PC Mark)	18h 39m Battery Life (PC Mark)

Compare Prices

₹37,999

@ Amazon

₹35,999

@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

Video

1 Video

There are no videos available for the device.

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Jun 19, 2026

(Official)

Apr 15, 2026

(Official)

Operating System

Android v16

OS Updates

N/A

3 Year

Security Updates

N/A

5 Year

Custom UI

HyperOS

Origin OS

Performance

Performance Rating

Very Good

Chipset

MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 SM7635-AC

Processor

Octa core

3.4 GHz, Single core, Cortex A725 3.2 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A725 2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A725

Octa core

2.7 GHz, Single core, Cortex A720 2.4 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

4 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Mali-G720 MC8

Adreno 810

RAM

8 GB / 12 GB

RAM Type

LPDDR5X Ultra

LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

2,135,669

1,167,242

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

18.0 s

24.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

4,175

1,138

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

N/A

4.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

N/A

16.7 %

* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Excellent

Best In Class

Display Type

AMOLED

Screen Size

6.59 inches (16.74 cm)

6.83 inches (17.35 cm)

Resolution

1268x2756 px (FHD+)

1260x2800 px (FHD+)

Peak Brightness

3500 nits

5000 nits

HBM Brightness

N/A

2000 nits

Refresh Rate

120 Hz

144 Hz

Aspect Ratio

20:9

Pixel Density

460 ppi

449 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

89.81 %

90.3 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla Glass Glass 7i

N/A

Bezel-less Display

Yes with punch-hole display

HDR 10 / HDR+ Support

Yes HDR 10+

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

88.7 %

N/A

Design

Height

157.53 mm

163.73 mm

Width

75.19 mm

76.18 mm

Thickness

8.18 mm

8.25 mm

Weight

204 grams

213 grams

Build Material

Back: Glass

Back: Plastic

Water Resistance

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP66 IP69K IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 2 meter)

Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69

Ruggedness

Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.5 Wide Angle1/1.95" sensor size IMX882

50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/1.95" sensor size IMX882

8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera

2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size

Autofocus

Yes

OIS

Yes

N/A

Flash

Yes LED Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A

SuperMoon

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

N/A

Video Recording

4k @30/60 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps
HD @30 fps

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps
HD @30/60 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Very Good

Resolution

20 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera

32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size

Flash

Yes Screen flash

Video Recording

Full HD @60 fps

N/A

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Excellent

Capacity

7540 mAh

9020 mAh

Battery Type

Silicon Carbon

Li-ion

Quick Charging

Yes 100W Hyper Charging 51% in 30 minutes

Yes 90W

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

16h 00m

18h 39m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

0h 51m 0s

0h 55m 0s

Storage

Internal Storage

256 GB

128 GB / 256 GB

Storage Type

UFS 4.1

UFS 3.1

Expandable Storage

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes

SIM 1

5G Bands:

FDD N1

N/A

4G Bands:

FD-LTE 2100(band 1)

N/A

SIM 2

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N66 / N77 / N78

5G Bands:

FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39) / 3500(band 42)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 850(band 26)

4G Bands:

TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19)