|
54%
Zears Andro Z5
|
54%
OPPO Neo
₹8,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Zears Andro Z5 vs OPPO Neo
Comparing the Zears Andro Z5 vs OPPO Neo across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO Neo runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Zears Andro Z5 runs at 1.2 GHz, making OPPO Neo the better performer.
Display: Zears Andro Z5 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while OPPO Neo offers 4.5 inches, making Zears Andro Z5 the larger display of the two. OPPO Neo features a IPS LCD display compared to Zears Andro Z5's LCD, making OPPO Neo the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while OPPO Neo offers 5 MP, making Zears Andro Z5 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: OPPO Neo offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Zears Andro Z5 offers 1.3 MP, making OPPO Neo better for front camera photography.
Battery: Zears Andro Z5 offers a higher battery capacity with 2350 mAh, while OPPO Neo offers 1900 mAh, making Zears Andro Z5 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Zears Andro Z5 and OPPO Neo offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Zears Andro Z5
|
✕
OPPO Neo
₹8,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
25 Jan, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Dual Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
1.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
2350 mAh
|
1900 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
2.3/5
(36 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Mali-400 MP
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
187 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.66 %
|
64.12 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Design
Height
|
146.2 mm
|
132 mm
|
Width
|
77.6 mm
|
65.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.4 mm
|
9.2 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
130 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2350 mAh
|
1900 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Single SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Micro
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v2.1
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|