|
|
|
|
all other mobiles with better specs are available much cheaper prices, this comp is giving 100 years old specs for 10 k, really disappointed with price????????????
Oppo's high end devices like Find7,Find7a,Oppo N1 etc are excellent devices to own. Unfortunately that's not the case with the low end budget devices from them.nnLook at the specs of this device, and compare it to a device selling for a few thousands less - Micromax Canvas Unite2. This only has a dual core processor, a 1.3Ghz Mediatek processor and Android Jellybean based Color OS 1.0 runs the show,while Unite 2 comes with a 1.3Ghz Quadcore and Stock Android Kitkat out of the box. At the same price as this device ships ie Rs. 10,990 (as of this writing) you can get Hexacore or even some 1.4Ghz octacore powered devices with better display,camera and overall performance. Xiaomi 1S also comes with far better specs for half the price.nnDual core 1.3Ghz with 1GB ram is OK, you can do most of your day to day tasks without much issues. This is running Color OS based on Android 4.2 Jellybean, a custom Android built by Oppo which adds a lot of gimmicks and features. I would have loved this coming with stock Android Kitkat as it offers better performance. Oppo really needs to up their game in order to get a strong foothold in the indian budget phone market. They need to price this a lot lesser, in 8K to get some ppl to even consider buying.
RAM | 512 MB |
Processor | MediaTek MT6572 |
Rear Camera | 5 MP |
Front Camera | 2 MP |
Battery | 1900 mAh |
Display | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Operating System | Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean) |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6572 |
CPU | Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7 |
Graphics | Mali-400 MP |
RAM |
512 MB
Below Average
|
Display Type | IPS LCD |
Screen Size | 4.5 inches (11.43 cm) |
Resolution | 480x854 px |
Pixel Density |
218 ppi
Poor
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated) | 64.12 % |
Screen Protection | No |
Touch Screen | Yes, Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch |
Height | 132 mm Compare Size |
Width | 65.8 mm |
Thickness |
9.2 mm
Average
|
Weight |
130 grams
Very Good
|
Colours | Black, White |
Main Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
5 MP, Primary Camera |
|
Autofocus | Yes | |
OIS | No | |
Image Resolution | 2592 x 1944 Pixels | |
Camera Features | Digital Zoom | |
Front Camera | ||
Camera Setup | Single | |
Resolution |
2 MP, Primary Camera |
Capacity | 1900 mAh |
Type | Li-ion |
Removable | Yes |
USB Type-C | No |
Internal Memory |
4 GB
Below Average
|
Expandable Memory | Yes, Up to 32 GB |
SIM Slot(s) | Single SIM, GSM+GSM |
SIM Size | SIM1: Micro |
Network Support | 5G Not Supported in India, 3G, 2G |
SIM 1 |
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 MHz 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz GPRS: Available EDGE: Available
|
Wi-Fi | Yes, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) |
Wi-Fi Features | Mobile Hotspot |
Bluetooth | Yes, v2.1 |
GPS | Yes with A-GPS |
NFC | No |
USB Connectivity | microUSB 2.0 |
FM Radio | Yes |
Loudspeaker | Yes |
Audio Jack | 3.5 mm |
Fingerprint Sensor | No |
Other Sensors | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer |
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
Smaller screen :
4.30 inches (10.92 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Lesser RAM:
1 GB vs 512 MB
Larger screen:
5.00 inches (12.7 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
Faster processor:
Dual core 1.5 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
Higher primary camera resolution:
8 MP vs 5 MP
More internal memory:
16 GB vs 4 GB
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
Smaller screen :
4.30 inches (10.92 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.2 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
Higher pixel density:
233 ppi vs 218 ppi
Larger screen:
4.70 inches (11.94 cm) vs 4.50 inches (11.43 cm)
Faster processor:
Quad core 1.3 GHz vs Dual core 1.3 GHz
More SIM card slots:
2 vs 1
Rs 25,990