|
75%
realme 5i
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
Motorola One Action
₹11,199
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme 5i vs Motorola One Action
Comparing the realme 5i vs Motorola One Action across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Motorola One Action scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,398, while realme 5i scores 1,371, making Motorola One Action the better performer.
Display: realme 5i offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while Motorola One Action offers 6.3 inches, making realme 5i the larger display of the two. Both realme 5i and Motorola One Action feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both realme 5i and Motorola One Action feature a 12 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Motorola One Action offers a higher front camera resolution with 12 MP, while realme 5i offers 8 MP, making Motorola One Action better for front camera photography.
Battery: realme 5i delivers longer battery life with 16h 24m, while Motorola One Action delivers 12h 31m, making realme 5i the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: realme 5i offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Motorola One Action offers 128 GB, making realme 5i the better option for storage.
Expert Review: realme 5i receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Motorola One Action is rated 7.
User Rating: realme 5i receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Motorola One Action has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
realme 5i
₹10,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Motorola One Action
₹11,199
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
15 Jan, 2020
|
30 Aug, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
16 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
12 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(413,632 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(30,589 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
172,716
AnTuTu Score
|
143,309
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 24m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
12h 31m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jan 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Aug 30, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
Android One
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9609
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.6 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
172,716
|
143,309
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
16.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
16.2 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
1080x2520 px (FHD+)
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
21:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
435 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.73 %
|
81.52 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
89 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
164.4 mm
|
160.1 mm
|
Width
|
75 mm
|
71.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
9.15 mm
|
Weight
|
195 grams
|
176 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
12 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.81/2.8" sensor size IMX386 CMOS image sensor Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size |
12 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 1.25µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
4k @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Reverse Charging
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 24m
|
12h 31m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 44m 7s
|
2h 6m 2s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.180 W/kg Body: 0.631 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|