|
77%
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
75%
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 20 Pro vs Moto G9 Power
Comparing the realme Narzo 20 Pro vs Moto G9 Power across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme Narzo 20 Pro scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,633, while Moto G9 Power scores 1,408, making realme Narzo 20 Pro the better performer.
Display: Moto G9 Power offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while realme Narzo 20 Pro offers 6.5 inches, making Moto G9 Power the larger display of the two. Both realme Narzo 20 Pro and Moto G9 Power feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Moto G9 Power offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while realme Narzo 20 Pro offers 48 MP, making Moto G9 Power better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both realme Narzo 20 Pro and Moto G9 Power feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Moto G9 Power offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while realme Narzo 20 Pro offers 4500 mAh, making Moto G9 Power better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both realme Narzo 20 Pro and Moto G9 Power offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both realme Narzo 20 Pro and Moto G9 Power equally at 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 20 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Moto G9 Power has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
realme Narzo 20 Pro
₹6,899
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Moto G9 Power
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
75%
|
Release Date
|
21 Sep, 2020
|
15 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
Snapdragon 662
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
64 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
65W Super Dart Charging
|
20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(112,162 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(32,482 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
169,608
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
28h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Dec 15, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
Stock
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G95
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 240 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G76 MC4
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
169,608
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
61.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
405 ppi
|
263 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.36 %
|
83.31 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.5 %
|
85 %
|
Design
Height
|
162.3 mm
|
172.1 mm
|
Width
|
75.4 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.4 mm
|
9.6 mm
|
Weight
|
191 grams
|
221 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP52
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.826 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
64 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.79 Wide Angle26 mm focal length 0.7µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.1 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.25 Primary Camera1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 65W Super Dart Charging 100% in 38 minutes
|
Yes 20W Turbo Power Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
28h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 48m 56s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 850(band 26) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 18) / 850(band 19) / 800(band 20) / 1900(band 25) / 850(band 26) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.934 W/kg
|
Head: 0.98 W/kg Body: 1.33 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|