|
74%
realme Narzo 20
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
72%
Tecno Pova 128GB
₹12,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 20 vs Tecno Pova 128GB
Comparing the realme Narzo 20 vs Tecno Pova 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Tecno Pova 128GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,362, while realme Narzo 20 scores 1,282, making Tecno Pova 128GB the better performer.
Display: Tecno Pova 128GB offers a screen size of 6.8 inches, while realme Narzo 20 offers 6.5 inches, making Tecno Pova 128GB the larger display of the two. Both realme Narzo 20 and Tecno Pova 128GB feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme Narzo 20 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Tecno Pova 128GB offers 16 MP, making realme Narzo 20 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both realme Narzo 20 and Tecno Pova 128GB feature a 8 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Tecno Pova 128GB delivers longer battery life with 20h 32m, while realme Narzo 20 delivers 19h 16m, making Tecno Pova 128GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: realme Narzo 20 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Tecno Pova 128GB offers 128 GB, making realme Narzo 20 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: realme Narzo 20 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Tecno Pova 128GB is rated 7.
User Rating: realme Narzo 20 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Tecno Pova 128GB has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
realme Narzo 20
₹12,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Tecno Pova 128GB
₹12,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
74%
|
72%
|
Release Date
|
21 Sep, 2020
|
11 Dec, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Quick Charging
|
18W Flash Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(529,865 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(2,283 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
204,495
AnTuTu Score
|
195,498
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 16m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
20h 32m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
|
Dec 11, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G85
|
MediaTek Helio G80
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
Mali-G52 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
204,495
|
195,498
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
37.0 s
|
19.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.1 %
|
56.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.8 inches (17.27 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
450 nits
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
60 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
263 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.7 %
|
82.88 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
88.7 %
|
90.4 %
|
Design
Height
|
164.5 mm
|
171.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.9 mm
|
77.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
9.4 mm
|
Weight
|
208 grams
|
215.5 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle 79° field-of-view26 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.85 |
|
8 MP
f/2.3 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Bokeh portrait video
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Dual LED
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
6000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Flash Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 16m
|
20h 32m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
3h 22m 6s
|
2h 2m 48s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.03 W/kg Body: 0.73 W/kg
|
Head: 1.039 W/kg Body: 1.145 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|