realme Narzo 20A 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G

Share  

Comparing the realme Narzo 20A 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,961, while realme Narzo 20A 64GB scores 1,380, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.


Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while realme Narzo 20A 64GB offers 6.5 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. realme Narzo 20A 64GB features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making realme Narzo 20A 64GB the better display of the two.


Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while realme Narzo 20A 64GB offers 12 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.


Front Camera: Both realme Narzo 20A 64GB and Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G feature a 8 MP primary front camera.


Battery: realme Narzo 20A 64GB delivers longer battery life with 14h 37m, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G delivers 12h 51m, making realme Narzo 20A 64GB the better pick for all day usage.


Storage: realme Narzo 20A 64GB offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making realme Narzo 20A 64GB the better option for storage.


Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher expert rating of 8.2 from the editorial team, while realme Narzo 20A 64GB is rated 7.


User Rating: realme Narzo 20A 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G has a rating of 4.1.

...read more
✕
realme Narzo 20A 64GB
₹12,990
@ Amazon
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹15,825
@ Amazon
Add to Compare

Summary

Spec Score

73%
75%

Release Date

21 Sep, 2020
17 Feb, 2026

Performance

Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
4 GB RAM
4 GB RAM
Snapdragon 665 vs Dimensity 6300

Display

6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
IPS LCD
LCD
720x1600 px (HD+)
720x1600 px (HD+)
60 Hz Refresh Rate
120 Hz Refresh Rate

Rear Camera

12 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
2 MP
Depth Camera
2 MP
Depth Camera
2 MP
Macro Camera
N/A

Front Camera

8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens

Battery

5000 mAh
6000 mAh
N/A
25W Fast Charging
N/A
No Wireless Charging

Storage

64 GB
128 GB
eMMC 5.1
eMMC 5.1

Expert Review

7.0/10
8.2/10

Pros

  • Solid build quality
  • Daylight photos are good
  • Lasting battery life
  • Great camera performance across scenarios
  • Best-in-segment video playback
  • Capable front camera

Cons

  • Retro camera seems useless
  • Micro-USB port
  • Average performance
  • 25W charging
  • LCD panel with HD+ resolution

User Ratings

4.4/5
(217,497 ratings)
4.1/5
(11,258 ratings)

Benchmarks (The higher, the better)

14h 37m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
N/A
532,024
AnTuTu Score

Compare Prices

₹12,990
@ Amazon
₹15,825
@ Amazon

Compare in 360 View

Video

Videos
1 Video
There are no videos available for the device.

User Feedback

General

Launch Date

Sep 21, 2020
(Official)
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)

Operating System

Android v10 (Q)
Android v16

OS Updates

N/A
6 Years

Security Updates

N/A
6 Years

Custom UI

Realme UI
Samsung One UI

Performance

Performance Rating

Good
Good

Chipset

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
View Details

Processor

Octa core

2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260
Octa core

2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55

Architecture (The higher, the better)

64 bit
64 bit

Fabrication (The lower, the better)

11 nm
6 nm

Graphics (GPU)

Adreno 610
Mali-G57 MC2

RAM

3 GB / 4 GB
4 GB / 6 GB

RAM Type

N/A
LPDDR4X

Performance Test Results

AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.

N/A
532,024

Bootup Time (The lower, the better)

28.0 s
30.0 s

Gaming Test Results

Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.

N/A
373

Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)

7.0 %
9.0 %

Heating* (The lower, the better)

19.1 %
32.6 %
* after 30 mins of gaming

Display

Display Rating

Very Good
Very Good

Display Type

IPS LCD
LCD

Screen Size

6.5 inches  (16.51 cm)
6.7 inches  (17.02 cm)

Resolution

720x1600 px (HD+)
720x1600 px (HD+)

Brightness

400 nits
N/A

Peak Brightness

N/A
800 nits

Refresh Rate

60 Hz
120 Hz

Touch Sampling Rate

120 Hz
N/A

Aspect Ratio

20:9
20:9

Pixel Density

270 ppi
260 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

82.29 %
83.65 %

Screen Protection

Corning Gorilla
No

Bezel-less Display

Yes with waterdrop notch
Yes with notch

Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)

89.8 %
N/A

Design

Height

164.4 mm
167.4 mm

Width

75.4 mm
77.4 mm

Thickness

8.9 mm
8.2 mm

Weight

195 grams
191 grams

Build Material

N/A
Back: Leather Plastic

Water Resistance

N/A
Yes Splash proof IP54

Ruggedness

N/A
Dust proof

Rear Camera

Rear Camera Rating

Good
Good

Resolution

12 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle 75° field-of-view28 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.25µm pixel size
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size
N/A

Autofocus

Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
Yes

OIS

N/A
No

Flash

Yes LED Flash
Yes LED Flash

Image Resolution

4000 x 3000 Pixels
8160 x 6120 Pixels

Settings

Exposure compensation ISO control
N/A

Shooting Modes

Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Auto Flash
Face detection
Touch to focus
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash

Video Recording

4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps
HD @120 fps

Front Camera

Front Camera Rating

Very Good
Very Good

Resolution

8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size CMOS 1.12µm pixel size
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size

Autofocus

N/A
No

Flash

Yes Screen flash
No

Camera Features

Fixed Focus
N/A

Video Recording

Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps
N/A

Compare Camera Samples

Battery

Battery Rating

Very Good
Very Good

Capacity

5000 mAh
6000 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion
Li-ion

Quick Charging

N/A
Yes 25W Fast Charging

Reverse Charging

Yes
N/A

Battery Test Results

Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.

14h 37m
12h 51m

Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)

2h 43m 1s
1h 14m

Storage

Internal Storage

32 GB / 64 GB
128 GB

Storage Type

eMMC 5.1
eMMC 5.1

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 256 GB
Yes Up to 1.5 TB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM
Dual SIM

SIM Type

SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano

Network Support

5G Not Supported 4G
5G 4G

VoLTE

Yes
Yes

SIM 1

4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)
N/A

SIM 2

4G Bands:
TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)
N/A

SAR Value

Head: 1.18 W/kg Body: 0.631 W/kg
Head: 0.24 W/kg

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz

Wi-Fi Features

Mobile Hotspot
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot

Bluetooth

Yes v4.2
Yes v5.3

GPS

Yes with A-GPS Glonass
Yes with A-GPS

NFC

No
No

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm
3.5 mm

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor

Yes
Yes

Fingerprint Sensor Position

Rear
Side

Other Sensors

Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope

Compare Prices

₹12,990
@ Amazon
₹15,825
@ Amazon