|
75%
realme Narzo 50
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Tecno Pova 4
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme Narzo 50 vs Tecno Pova 4
Comparing the realme Narzo 50 vs Tecno Pova 4 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Tecno Pova 4 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,818, while realme Narzo 50 scores 1,696, making Tecno Pova 4 the better performer.
Display: Tecno Pova 4 offers a screen size of 6.82 inches, while realme Narzo 50 offers 6.6 inches, making Tecno Pova 4 the larger display of the two. Both realme Narzo 50 and Tecno Pova 4 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both realme Narzo 50 and Tecno Pova 4 feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: realme Narzo 50 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Tecno Pova 4 offers 8 MP, making realme Narzo 50 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Tecno Pova 4 delivers longer battery life with 18h 34m, while realme Narzo 50 delivers 16h 14m, making Tecno Pova 4 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: realme Narzo 50 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Tecno Pova 4 offers 128 GB, making realme Narzo 50 the better option for storage.
User Rating: realme Narzo 50 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Tecno Pova 4 has a rating of 4.
|
✕
realme Narzo 50
₹10,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Tecno Pova 4
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
75%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
03 Mar, 2022
|
11 Dec, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.05 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2412 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
33W Dart Charging
|
18W Flash Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(19,281 ratings)
|
4/5
(1,517 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
348,006
AnTuTu Score
|
366,981
AnTuTu Score
|
|
16h 14m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
18h 34m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Mar 03, 2022
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v11
|
Android v12
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
HiOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio G96
|
MediaTek Helio G99
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.05 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
348,006
|
366,981
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
7.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
28.4 %
|
28.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.6 inches (16.76 cm)
|
6.82 inches (17.32 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2412 px (FHD+)
|
720x1640 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
480 nits
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
400 ppi
|
263 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.88 %
|
83.72 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.8 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
164.1 mm
|
170.5 mm
|
Width
|
75.5 mm
|
77.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
194 grams
|
213 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IPX2
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 Wide Angle |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
0.08 MP
Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
2560x1440 @ 30 fps
|
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
Ultra Steady Video |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.05 Primary Camera1/3" sensor size |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Dart Charging
|
Yes 18W Flash Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
16h 14m
|
18h 34m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 0m 42s
|
2h 40m 20s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.184 W/kg Body: 0.824 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
DTS Sound
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|