|
72%
realme U1
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
71%
Xiaomi Redmi Y3
₹11,685
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme U1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Y3
Comparing the realme U1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Y3 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme U1 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 5,024, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 scores 4,226, making realme U1 the better performer.
Display: realme U1 offers a screen size of 6.3 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 offers 6.26 inches, making realme U1 the larger display of the two. Both realme U1 and Xiaomi Redmi Y3 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: realme U1 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 offers 12 MP, making realme U1 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Y3 offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while realme U1 offers 25 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Y3 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Y3 offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while realme U1 offers 3500 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi Y3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both realme U1 and Xiaomi Redmi Y3 offer the same internal storage of 32 GB.
Expert Review: realme U1 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while Xiaomi Redmi Y3 is rated 7.
User Rating: realme U1 and Xiaomi Redmi Y3 both receive the same user rating of 4.3.
|
✕
realme U1
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Y3
₹11,685
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
05 Dec, 2018
|
30 Apr, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Snapdragon 632
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.26 inches (15.9 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
12 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
25 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(52,114 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(76,423 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
109,302
AnTuTu Score
|
104,342
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
15h 38m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 05, 2018
(Official)
|
Apr 30, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v8.1 (Oreo)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 250 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 250 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
14 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 506
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR3
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
109,302
|
104,342
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
19.0 s
|
25.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
9.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
21.8 %
|
9.9 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
6.26 inches (15.9 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.68 %
|
81.23 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.8 %
|
86.8 %
|
Design
Height
|
157 mm
|
158.7 mm
|
Width
|
74 mm
|
75.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
168 grams
|
180 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/2.2CMOS image sensor |
12 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/2.9" sensor size CMOS image sensor 1.25µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4000 x 3000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
25 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size Exmor RS 0.9µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.25 Primary Camera1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3500 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 51.5 Hours(2G)
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
15h 38m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 10m 34s
|
2h 19m 29s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.031 W/kg Body: 0.573 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v4.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|