|
79%
realme X2
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
realme X2 vs vivo S1 Pro
Comparing the realme X2 vs vivo S1 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme X2 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,750, while vivo S1 Pro scores 1,369, making realme X2 the better performer.
Display: realme X2 offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while vivo S1 Pro offers 6.38 inches, making realme X2 the larger display of the two. Both realme X2 and vivo S1 Pro feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: realme X2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 64 MP, while vivo S1 Pro offers 48 MP, making realme X2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both realme X2 and vivo S1 Pro feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo S1 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 4500 mAh, while realme X2 offers 4000 mAh, making vivo S1 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: realme X2 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo S1 Pro offers 128 GB, making realme X2 the better option for storage.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both realme X2 and vivo S1 Pro equally at 7.
User Rating: realme X2 receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while vivo S1 Pro has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
realme X2
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
vivo S1 Pro
₹20,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
20 Dec, 2019
|
04 Jan, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 730G
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
64 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
30W VOOC Charging
|
18W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(36,937 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(38,771 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
266,028
AnTuTu Score
|
172,519
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
13h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 20, 2019
(Official)
|
Jan 04, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Realme UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
266,028
|
172,519
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
28.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
6.0 %
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
29.8 %
|
22.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
403 ppi
|
404 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.07 %
|
83.39 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.9 %
|
90 %
|
Design
Height
|
158.7 mm
|
159.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
75.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
8.6 mm
|
Weight
|
182 grams
|
186.7 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Gorilla Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
64 MP
Primary Camera5x Digital Zoomf/1.85.58 mm focal length 1/1.7" sensor size S5KGW1 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.66 mm focal length 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1.75µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
9000 x 7000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
5 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Custom Watermark Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.81 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS 0.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 30W VOOC Charging v4.0 65% in 30 minutes
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
13h 23m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
0h 58m 40s
|
1h 40m 3s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
eMMC
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.160 W/kg Body: 0.521 W/kg
|
Head: 1.191 W/kg Body: 0.475 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
Dolby Atmos
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|