|
76%
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
71%
OPPO A9 2020
₹21,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo S1 64GB vs OPPO A9 2020
Comparing the vivo S1 64GB vs OPPO A9 2020 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo S1 64GB scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,037, while OPPO A9 2020 scores 1,352, making vivo S1 64GB the better performer.
Display: OPPO A9 2020 offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while vivo S1 64GB offers 6.38 inches, making OPPO A9 2020 the larger display of the two. vivo S1 64GB features a Super AMOLED display compared to OPPO A9 2020's IPS LCD, making vivo S1 64GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: OPPO A9 2020 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while vivo S1 64GB offers 16 MP, making OPPO A9 2020 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo S1 64GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while OPPO A9 2020 offers 16 MP, making vivo S1 64GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: OPPO A9 2020 delivers longer battery life with 15h 56m, while vivo S1 64GB delivers 12h 55m, making OPPO A9 2020 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: vivo S1 64GB offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while OPPO A9 2020 offers 128 GB, making vivo S1 64GB the better option for storage.
User Rating: vivo S1 64GB receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while OPPO A9 2020 has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo S1 64GB
₹20,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
OPPO A9 2020
₹21,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
71%
|
Release Date
|
09 Sep, 2019
|
16 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Snapdragon 665
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
60 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(7,064 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(62,421 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
146,341
AnTuTu Score
|
134,811
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
15h 56m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
146,341
|
134,811
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
24.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
14.5 %
|
19.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
480 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
60 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
404 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.12 %
|
82.47 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
89 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.5 mm
|
163.6 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
75.6 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
9.1 mm
|
Weight
|
179 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.78 Wide Angle1/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2.25" sensor size S5KGM1 CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 55m
|
15h 56m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 52m 11s
|
2h 39m 43s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.756 W/kg Body: 0.335 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Rear
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|