|
76%
vivo S1 6GB RAM
₹17,200
(Discontinued)
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo S1 6GB RAM vs Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
Comparing the vivo S1 6GB RAM vs Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo S1 6GB RAM scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,037, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB scores 1,273, making vivo S1 6GB RAM the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers a screen size of 6.4 inches, while vivo S1 6GB RAM offers 6.38 inches, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB the larger display of the two. Both vivo S1 6GB RAM and Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while vivo S1 6GB RAM offers 16 MP, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: vivo S1 6GB RAM offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offers 16 MP, making vivo S1 6GB RAM better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB delivers longer battery life with 14h 29m, while vivo S1 6GB RAM delivers 12h 55m, making Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo S1 6GB RAM and Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
User Rating: vivo S1 6GB RAM receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB has a rating of 4.2.
|
✕
vivo S1 6GB RAM
₹17,200
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy M30s 128GB
₹16,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
06 Aug, 2019
|
18 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
6 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
15W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(5,598 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(248,812 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
146,341
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
12h 55m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 29m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Sep 18, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P65
|
Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9611
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 1.7 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G52
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
146,341
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
22.0 s
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
14.5 %
|
22.4 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.38 inches (16.21 cm)
|
6.4 inches (16.26 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
420 nits
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
404 ppi
|
403 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.12 %
|
84.02 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90 %
|
91 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.5 mm
|
159 mm
|
Width
|
75.2 mm
|
75.1 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.1 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
179 grams
|
188 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.781/2.8" sensor size IMX499 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoomf/2.0 Wide Angle 80° field-of-view1/2" sensor size S5KGM2 ISOCELL Plus 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
4 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 30 fps |
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.06" sensor size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 49 Hours(4G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 15W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 55m
|
14h 29m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 52m 11s
|
4h 54m 37s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.756 W/kg Body: 0.335 W/kg
|
Head: 0.486 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Rear
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|