|
76%
vivo T1 44W
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo T1 44W vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
Comparing the vivo T1 44W vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,639, while vivo T1 44W scores 1,550, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the better performer.
Display: vivo T1 44W offers a screen size of 6.44 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers 6.43 inches, making vivo T1 44W the larger display of the two. Both vivo T1 44W and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both vivo T1 44W and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo T1 44W offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers 13 MP, making vivo T1 44W better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo T1 44W delivers longer battery life with 18h 16m, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G delivers 16h 43m, making vivo T1 44W the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while vivo T1 44W offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G the better option for storage.
Expert Review: vivo T1 44W receives a higher expert rating of 7.5 from the editorial team, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo T1 44W receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G has a rating of 4.1.
|
✕
vivo T1 44W
₹14,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
₹9,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
05 May, 2022
|
11 Feb, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 680
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
44W Flash Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.5/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(115,562 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(71,050 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
18h 16m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 43m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
|
N/A
|
269,010
AnTuTu Score
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 05, 2022
(Official)
|
Feb 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.9 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
269,010
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
30.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
6.3 %
|
13.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
180 Hz
|
180 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.49 %
|
84.64 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.12 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
160.8 mm
|
159.8 mm
|
Width
|
73.7 mm
|
73.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
8 mm
|
Weight
|
182 grams
|
179 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Movie Frame
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
13 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 44W Flash Charging 50% in 28 minutes
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 60 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 16m
|
16h 43m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 5m 33s
|
1h 9m 1s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
Side
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|