|
78%
vivo T1
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB
₹12,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo T1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB
Comparing the vivo T1 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo T1 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,947, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB scores 1,639, making vivo T1 the better performer.
Display: vivo T1 offers a screen size of 6.58 inches, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB offers 6.43 inches, making vivo T1 the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB features a AMOLED display compared to vivo T1's IPS LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo T1 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo T1 offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB offers 13 MP, making vivo T1 better for front camera photography.
Battery: vivo T1 delivers longer battery life with 19h 51m, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB delivers 16h 43m, making vivo T1 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo T1 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo T1 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB equally at 7.
User Rating: vivo T1 receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB has a rating of 4.1.
|
vivo T1
₹15,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G 128GB
₹12,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
14 Feb, 2022
|
11 Feb, 2022
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 695
|
Snapdragon 680
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.58 inches (16.71 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
33W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(69,872 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(67,220 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
409,989
AnTuTu Score
|
269,010
AnTuTu Score
|
|
19h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
16h 43m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Feb 14, 2022
(Official)
|
Feb 11, 2022
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v12
|
Android v11
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 265 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 619
|
Adreno 610
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
409,989
|
269,010
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
16.0 s
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
3.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
22.5 %
|
13.8 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.58 inches (16.71 cm)
|
6.43 inches (16.33 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2408 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
1000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
401 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.09 %
|
84.64 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.60 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
164 mm
|
159.8 mm
|
Width
|
75.8 mm
|
73.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.2 mm
|
8 mm
|
Weight
|
187 grams
|
179 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP53
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide AngleS5KJN1 ISO-CELL |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle26 mm focal length |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Movie Frame
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
13 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 33W Fast Charging 100% in 60 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
19h 51m
|
16h 43m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 51m 0s
|
1h 9m 1s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
5G Bands: TDD N77 / N78
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: TDD N77 / N78
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.16 W/kg Body: 0.98 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|