|
82%
vivo T5 Pro
₹37,197
@Amazon
|
90%
iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo T5 Pro vs iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
Comparing the vivo T5 Pro vs iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 4.21 GHz, while vivo T5 Pro runs at 2.7 GHz, making iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G the better performer.
Display: Both vivo T5 Pro and iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G offer the same screen size of 6.83 inches, but vivo T5 Pro features a AMOLED display compared to iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G's Flat OLED, making vivo T5 Pro the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both vivo T5 Pro and iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G feature a 50 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: vivo T5 Pro offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G offers 16 MP, making vivo T5 Pro better for front camera photography.
Battery: iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 9200 mAh, while vivo T5 Pro offers 9020 mAh, making iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G offers higher internal storage with 256 GB, while vivo T5 Pro offers 128 GB, making iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G the better option for storage.
|
vivo T5 Pro
₹37,197
@ Amazon
|
iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
82%
|
90%
|
Release Date
|
21 Apr, 2026
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.7 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 4.21 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
| Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs Dimensity 9500 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.83 inches (17.35 cm)
|
6.83 inches (17.35 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
Flat OLED
|
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1440x2560 px (QHD (2k))
|
|
144 Hz Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
9020 mAh
|
9200 mAh
|
|
90W
|
100W
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
256 GB
|
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 4.0
|
Expert Review
|
8.5/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.5/5
(9,645 ratings)
|
N/A
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
1,167,242
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
18h 39m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹37,197
@ Amazon
|
Not Available in any store
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 15, 2026
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v16
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
3 Year
|
N/A
|
Security Updates
|
5 Year
|
N/A
|
Custom UI
|
Origin OS
|
Origin OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 SM7635-AC
View Details
|
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.7 GHz, Single core, Cortex A720 2.4 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520 |
Octa core
4.21 GHz, Single core, Arm C1-Ultra 3.5 GHz, Tri core, ARM C1-Premium 2.7 GHz, Quad core, ARM C1-Pro |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
4 nm
|
3 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 810
|
Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
|
RAM
|
8 GB / 12 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR5X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
1,167,242
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
24.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
1,138
|
N/A
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
4.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
16.7 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
Flat OLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.83 inches (17.35 cm)
|
6.83 inches (17.35 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1260x2800 px (FHD+)
|
1440x2560 px (QHD (2k))
|
Peak Brightness
|
5000 nits
|
N/A
|
HBM Brightness
|
2000 nits
|
N/A
|
PWM Dimming
|
2160 Hz
|
N/A
|
Refresh Rate
|
144 Hz
|
N/A
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
130 Hz
|
N/A
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
449 ppi
|
430 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
90.3 %
|
103.47 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Design
Height
|
163.73 mm
|
163.42 mm
|
Width
|
76.18 mm
|
75.88 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.25 mm
|
8.60 mm
|
Weight
|
213 grams
|
225 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Water Resistance
|
Yes Water resistant IP68 IP69
|
N/A
|
Ruggedness
|
Dust proof
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/1.95" sensor size IMX882 |
50 MP
Primary Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1/5.0" sensor size |
8 MP
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Shooting Modes
|
SuperMoon
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @30/60 fps HD @30/60 fps |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/3.1" sensor size |
16 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
9020 mAh
|
9200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 90W
|
Yes 100W
|
Reverse Charging
|
Yes 5W Reverse Charging
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
18h 39m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
55m
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 3.1
|
UFS 4.0
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
No
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 2
|
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
N/A
|
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 3500(band 42) / 3700(band 43) / 3500(band 48)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 850(band 19) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.02 W/kg Body: 0.83 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) MIMO
|
Yes Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/be/ax) MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.2
|
Yes v6.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
IR Blaster
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Ultrasonic
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
N/A
|
Compare Prices
|
₹37,197
@ Amazon
|
Not Available in any store
|
Related Comparisons
vivo T5 Pro
vivo T5 5G
vivo T5 Pro
vivo S2 5G
vivo T5 Pro
vivo T4 Pro
vivo T5 Pro
vivo T5x
vivo T5 Pro
vivo T4 Ultra
vivo T5 Pro
vivo V70 FE
vivo T5 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Fusion
vivo T5 Pro
iQOO Z11 5G
vivo T5 Pro
OnePlus Nord 6
vivo T5 Pro
OnePlus Nord CE 6 5G
vivo T5 Pro
POCO X8 Power 5G
vivo T5 Pro
Motorola Edge 70 Pro 5G
vivo T5 Pro
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
vivo T5 Pro
vivo V60
vivo T5 Pro
vivo V70
iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
iQOO 15R
iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
iQOO Neo 10
iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
iQOO Z11 5G
iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
OnePlus Nord 6
iQOO Neo 11 Ultra 5G
OnePlus 15R