|
79%
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
77%
Samsung Galaxy A70
₹30,900
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo V17 vs Samsung Galaxy A70
Comparing the vivo V17 vs Samsung Galaxy A70 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy A70 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 6,519, while vivo V17 scores 1,651, making Samsung Galaxy A70 the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy A70 offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while vivo V17 offers 6.44 inches, making Samsung Galaxy A70 the larger display of the two. Both vivo V17 and Samsung Galaxy A70 feature the same Super AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: vivo V17 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 48 MP, while Samsung Galaxy A70 offers 32 MP, making vivo V17 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both vivo V17 and Samsung Galaxy A70 feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy A70 delivers longer battery life with 15h 39m, while vivo V17 delivers 12h 09m, making Samsung Galaxy A70 the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both vivo V17 and Samsung Galaxy A70 offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Samsung Galaxy A70 receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while vivo V17 is rated 7.
User Rating: vivo V17 receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while Samsung Galaxy A70 has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo V17
₹27,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy A70
₹30,900
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
79%
|
77%
|
Release Date
|
10 Dec, 2019
|
01 May, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 675
|
Snapdragon 675
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
32 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
|
18W Fast Charging
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.0
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(13,957 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(6,606 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
227,722
AnTuTu Score
|
168,858
AnTuTu Score
|
|
12h 09m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
15h 39m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 10, 2019
(Official)
|
May 01, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Octa core
2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 460 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 460 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
11 nm
|
11 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 612
|
Adreno 612
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
227,722
|
168,858
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
26.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
11.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
33.7 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Best In Class
|
Best In Class
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.44 inches (16.36 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
409 ppi
|
393 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.99 %
|
86 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
91.38 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
159 mm
|
164.3 mm
|
Width
|
74.1 mm
|
76.7 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
7.9 mm
|
Weight
|
176 grams
|
183 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/2" sensor size IMX582 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
Primary Camera8x Digital Zoomf/1.726 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera13 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera12 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
6500 x 4920 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Burst mode |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
8 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera23 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size CMOS 0.8µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4500 mAh
|
4500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 28 Hours(3G)
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 18W Fast Charging
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 09m
|
15h 39m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 46m 18s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.0
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.990 W/kg Body: 0.251 W/kg
|
Head: 0.774 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|