|
81%
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
78%
OPPO Reno 4 Pro
₹21,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
vivo X50 vs OPPO Reno 4 Pro
Comparing the vivo X50 vs OPPO Reno 4 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: vivo X50 scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 1,780, while OPPO Reno 4 Pro scores 1,699, making vivo X50 the better performer.
Display: vivo X50 offers a screen size of 6.56 inches, while OPPO Reno 4 Pro offers 6.5 inches, making vivo X50 the larger display of the two. Both vivo X50 and OPPO Reno 4 Pro feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: Both vivo X50 and OPPO Reno 4 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both vivo X50 and OPPO Reno 4 Pro feature a 32 MP primary front camera.
Battery: vivo X50 offers a higher battery capacity with 4200 mAh, while OPPO Reno 4 Pro offers 4000 mAh, making vivo X50 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both vivo X50 and OPPO Reno 4 Pro offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: The editorial team rates both vivo X50 and OPPO Reno 4 Pro equally at 7.
User Rating: OPPO Reno 4 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.4, while vivo X50 has a rating of 4.3.
|
✕
vivo X50
₹39,990
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
OPPO Reno 4 Pro
₹21,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
81%
|
78%
|
Release Date
|
24 Jul, 2020
|
05 Aug, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 730
|
Snapdragon 720G
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
13 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
|
5 MP
Macro Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
32 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4200 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
|
33W Flash Charging
|
65W VOOC Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
7.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.3/5
(2,567 ratings)
|
4.4/5
(2,963 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
281,854
AnTuTu Score
|
279,392
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
9h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 24, 2020
(Official)
|
Aug 05, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
Funtouch OS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 470 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 470 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 465 1.8 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 465 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
8 nm
|
8 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 618
|
Adreno 618
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
281,854
|
279,392
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
5.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.56 inches (16.66 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2376 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
500 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
90 Hz
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.8:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
398 ppi
|
405 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
86.51 %
|
86.99 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
HDR 10 / HDR+ Support
|
Yes HDR 10+
|
N/A
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
92.8 %
|
92 %
|
Design
Height
|
159.5 mm
|
160.2 mm
|
Width
|
75.3 mm
|
73.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.5 mm
|
7.7 mm
|
Weight
|
173 grams
|
161 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Mineral Glass
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera20x Digital Zoomf/1.6 Wide AngleIMX598 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor |
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.726 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
13 MP
f/2.46 Depth Camera50 mm focal length |
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera16 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.48 Macro Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera22 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
20 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
4k @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps HD @240 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.45 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.8" sensor size 0.8µm pixel size |
32 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/2.74" sensor size Exmor RS 0.8µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes Soft light flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4200 mAh
|
4000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 33W Flash Charging v2.0
|
Yes 65W VOOC Charging v2.0 100% in 36 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
9h 23m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
1h 17m 32s
|
0h 36m 21s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.24 W/kg Body: 0.39 W/kg
|
Head: 1.19 W/kg Body: 0.74 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz MIMO
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.1
|
Yes v5.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
USB Type-C
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
Dolby Atmos
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|